The 1% don’t use Bitcoin Exchanges

Given that the Brexit is still fresh in our minds — the big question of “how will the global financial elite diversify their assets” is one that every money manager and their clients are discussing this weekend. Fine timing for a Bitcoin post!

I sent a tweet out earlier this morning (followed by a tweet storm!) and there was a lot of activity around it and I felt compelled to explain it in more detail.

One of the key themes of a prior post I wrote in 2014, was that the Bitcoin exchange infrastructure for the ordinary man on the street was not yet in place, and that this fact would be partially responsible for the subsequent sideways/downward trading in Bitcoin that eventually occurred as predicted.

To recap a quote from that post (dated March 31st 2014), entitled Finding Equilibrium:

Lack of trust with exchanges and limited capability to purchase Consumers are spooked right now. MtGox ran away with $500m+ in Bitcoins and is bankrupt. No one truly trusts any of the exchanges — even some smaller exchanges went under the past three months. The only “safe” place to buy Bitcoin in the USA is via Coinbase and they are not an exchange. The US does not have a single licensed Bitcoin exchange and the rest of the world is reeling from MtGox. Bitstamp is proving to be the fresh global exchange of choice but the media has done a superb job of keeping fresh potential Bitcoin users at bay with the usual inflammatory headlines whenever something negative happens in the Bitcoin space. Most people I know who want to buy and sell Bitcoin are doing it “off-book” — which means the transactions are going instead via trusted networks. This will take buyers out of the marketplace and will ultimately mask the true supply/request curve for Bitcoin. Anyone who doesn’t know a buyer will sell their coins via an exchange or via a merchant accepting Bitcoin which will put sell side pressure on the BTC price. So instead of “buy side” money winding up in the exchanges which would be used to drive up the price, it’s sitting on the sidelines which has the influence of lowering the request side of the equation within the marketplaces where Bitcoin is priced.

In my subsequent post two months ago, entitled Bitcoin 2016, I referenced the switches since the prior post:

There is a strong trust in exchanges and platforms for purchasing Bitcoin, such as Bitstamp, which recently got EU regulatory approval, Coinbase, Kraken, Circle, BitX and others.

What I didn’t cover in this post is what happened to the OTC (Over The Counter) market.

Over-the-counter (OTC) is a security traded in some context other than on a formal exchange such as the NYSE, TSX, AMEX, etc. The phrase “over-the-counter” can be used to refer to stocks that trade via a dealer network as opposed to on a centralized exchange. — Investopedia

The OTC market has continued to grow, and there are an estimated 10–15 formal OTC brokers out there for Bitcoin with any real volume, and maybe 3–4 who are more well known and trusted, such as Harry Yeh of Binary Financial and a few more referenced by Wong Joon Ian in his Coindesk post, (which is well worth reading) on OTC Bitcoin trading. In the case of LocalBitcoins, they deal with smaller transactions but many exchanges also facilitate larger trades, off-book.

Many of the very wealthy individuals that I know who are looking to get into Bitcoin are not going to the exchanges. The thresholds are not significant enough for them. If a High Net-Worth Individual (HNI) has a net worth of $100m and desired to place just $1m of that into Bitcoin as a hedge against market disruption, it would be imprudent of him to place that order on the open market. That is a single trade of over 1,000 BTC and it would thrust his price up (called slippage) significantly. Instead, he would call a broker, agree on a price (typically a few dollars above market spot price), and then perform the trade outside the market. The broker would match buyers and sellers and the exchange volume would not reflect the buying or selling activity for that trade. Now, imagine if a billionaire wished to allocate 0.5% of his or her assets to Bitcoin. That is simply not possible on exchanges.

In doing some background research for this blog post, I spoke to a duo of OTC traders that I know and gathered the following data points:

The largest purchase I was able to uncover is around $50m on the OTC market and regular eight figure purchases are now common. Given the scale of purchases this size, an order like this has to be packed using tranches. Brokers typically pack and price orders like this in 6,000–8,000 BTC tranches to prevent the market from pushing the price up and therefore it’s a combination of matching sellers and buyers, and then backfilling the balance from the exchanges (!! — nb, exchanges are being used for top ups, not primary transactions).

Typically, this year has been largely 66% buyers — 33% sellers in the OTC market according to my sources, but since the Brexit last week and the latest run-up, even more buyers have entered the OTC market — which is not being reflected in the price.

My key point in this blog post is that exchange volume doesn’t represent true market based Bitcoin request and supply. Traders are technically trading on only a portion of the deals being transacted. Also, a lot of trading on the exchange market is back and forward arbitrage trading — not true request (for e.g. buy and hold), so trade volumes are strongly inflated. For example, I could take $Ten,000 and trade (buy & sell) that volume at least five times per day using a bot and generate over $1m in exchange volume during the course of the month. This means nothing, but it inflates the volumes we see on exchanges. Exchange to Exchange price arbitrage also makes up a large portion of the volume.

OTC brokers are also powerfully used in cases where individuals are attempting to circumvent exchange controls and so this is going to become an even more common use case, as exchanges cannot operate in those markets effectively.

I think I’ve been pretty on-the-money with my predictions on Bitcoin over the past duo of years, and after it quickly broke through the $700 adjusted ATH (All Time High) barrier that I wrote about in my previous post, I was stunned. My gut reaction was that I was wrong about the expected liquidity pool and resistance at $700 and the market was speaking for itself after it zoomed past $725 and was going to head straight to $1151. Then, after it went closer to $800, it all of a sudden stopped, dropped and flipped down to $550 — now at c.$650 — which is what I originally predicted.

I’ve been providing this volatility a lot of thought this past week — and this post sums up why I think that using exchange data, albeit somewhat reliable, doesn’t tell the entire picture on a supply/request basis. High Net Worth Individuals are not buying Bitcoin through exchanges — they need to use brokers for the amount that they are buying or will not budge the dial for them on their goals.

This also infers that, technically, exchanges today are thinly traded. If I wished to buy $50m in Bitcoin, what would prevent me from shorting the market by with $2–5m, forcing the price down and then buying $50m in volume from OTC traders who have clients panicking? Market manipulation, albeit seemingly unlikely, is entirely plausible in a thinly traded market where large trades happen outside the exchange. This will switch if and when the Bitcoin price and market cap is adequately large and liquid enough that 10k BTC trades (enough for an OTC tranche) would not budge the price significantly.

Another point worth noting is that large BTC buyers who are looking to diversify their portfolios are typically buy and hold buyers. They do not get panicked (they don’t care if they lose it as they are already wealthy) — so it’s a diversification strategy and when these transactions happen, the coins are permanently eliminated from the market (for a duo of years, at the very least). This means that if we’re looking at exchange data, the number of brief positions in the market could be quickly squeezed out if there is a price rise to a point of high liquidity where buy transactions budge from OTC back into the exchanges (causing the brief squeezes I have been predicting in prior posts).

In summary, until we have a marketplace where OTC brokers are not needed to fulfill large orders, Bitcoin will be volatile. There is a significant amount of money from the global financial elite that is still sitting on the sidelines and now looking to get in, given the Brexit and other unfolding global politicol events and once it does there will be a brief squeeze on traders presently shorting Bitcoin because the exchange volumes do not accurately reflect the request side of the equation and the upcoming halving day is going to gasp the supply of fresh coins.

Bloomberg’s latest article, simply proves my point around sentiment, but what they miss is that the 1% are not using exchanges…

If you liked reading this, please take a minute recommend it and share with your friends! And you can also go after me on Twitter!

Related video:

admin_en | 1@1.com

Related Posts

Who wants to be a OneCoin millionaire? YOU don’t – here’s why hyped-up web currency is virtually worthless Bitcoin is the virtual currency world leader and it is claimed that OneCoin comes next, but something doesn’t add up Share Comments 17:20, ten FEB 2016 Updated 08:04, twelve FEB 2016 Share Comments Welcome to a get-rich-quick […]

blockchain Leveraging Industry-First HCI Innovations to Enhance Security, Lower TCO and . –VMware Hyper-Converged Infrastructure: A Modern Treatment to Empowering Users and IT . –VMware See More Blockchain is a type of distributed ledger for maintaining a permanent and tamper-proof record of transactional data.

Без кейворда Given the enlargening prominence of the idea blockchain tech will influence enterprise business, both retail investors and investment institutions are optimistic the market could soon develop into a vibrant fresh asset class. However, to date, there have been few alternative digital assets that have suggested a value proposition that differs from that of […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *